Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured routing skill: concrete decision tables, explicit overrides, a validation checkpoint, and a clean file split with a working file map. The main gaps are a lack of a filled worked example and slightly subjective validation wording.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and assumes Claude's competence — routing tables, overrides, and an output template carry most of the weight — with only minor motivational padding ('you've defeated the skill', 'routing failures produce slop') that could be trimmed, so it sits above the 3 anchor but not at the every-token-earns-its-place 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete routing tables map phase/domain/specificity to specific method file paths, override rules fire on explicit cues, and there is a copy-paste output template — but the template uses placeholders ([Name], [One-line pitch]) and no fully filled worked example, leaving it just short of the 5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 4-step routing procedure with an explicit 'Anti-default check (run before generating)' checkpoint and a redo loop ('routing failed, redo'); not a destructive/batch op so no cap applies, but the validation is subjective ('looks like what an unrouted LLM would produce') rather than programmatic, holding it at 4 instead of 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | SKILL.md is an overview with a dedicated File Map; 22 method files and the prompt library are split into one-level-deep references (references/ and references/methods/), all referenced paths verified to exist, and navigation is easy — matching the 5 anchor; it is not the nested-reference-chain anti-pattern of the 1 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |