Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a strong, execution-oriented reference: concrete CLI commands with flags, executable jq pipelines, numeric interpretation thresholds, real error-cause-fix mappings, and well-signaled one-level-deep references that all exist in the bundle. Its main weakness is mild token redundancy — the annotated live-metrics schema and some interpretive guidance duplicate content already delegated to references/metrics.md and could be slimmed. Workflow organization is by use case with explicit validation and error recovery rather than one canonical sequence.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and command-driven with almost no explanation of concepts Claude already knows — domain-specific material (FAA/TAR/TBR formulas, sleep stage targets, protocol triggers) legitimately earns its tokens. Anchor 4 ("Efficient; minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed") fits because the ~20-metric annotated JSON block partially duplicates what is delegated to references/metrics.md, and the DO/DON'T interpretation examples run slightly long. Not 5 for that duplication; not 3 because the padding is minor relative to the mostly lean tables and commands. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Every section gives copy-paste-ready executable commands (`npx neuroskill status --json`, jq pipelines like `.insights.deltas | to_entries | sort_by(.value.pct)`), concrete numeric thresholds (Focus < 0.40, TBR > 1.5, SNR < 3 dB), and specific interpretation examples. Anchor 5 ("Fully executable; copy-paste ready code or commands; specific examples cover the common cases") matches; not 4 because no key detail is missing for the covered cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequences are clear and validation is present: the "Verify Setup" block, signal-quality and SNR checks, an Error Handling table mapping failures to fixes (a feedback loop), and per-scenario workflows in "Example Interactions" with interpretation and follow-up steps. Anchor 4 ("Clear sequence with most checkpoints present") fits rather than 5 because the document is organized as a command reference by use case rather than a single explicit end-to-end sequence with ordered checkpoints; not 3 since error recovery guidance is explicit, not absent. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The overview clearly signals all three real bundle files ("See references/metrics.md for the full metric reference, references/protocols.md for intervention protocols, and references/api.md for the WebSocket/HTTP API") and re-points to them at point of use, one level deep, matching the actual bundle listing. Anchor 4 ("Good structure; most content appropriately placed; references mostly clear; minor organization gaps") fits rather than 5 because the detailed metric schema and interpretation thresholds are inlined in SKILL.md alongside metrics.md rather than being fully split out. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |