CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

one-three-one-rule

1-3-1 decision briefs: problem, three options, one pick.

65

Quality

80%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is exemplary: lean, fully actionable, with a clearly sequenced workflow, an explicit verification checklist, a revision feedback loop, and well-organized sections that need no external bundle.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and well-structured, assuming Claude's competence with no padding or explanation of basic decision-making concepts; every line (Procedure bullets, Verification checklist, concrete Example) earns its place.

5 / 5

Actionability

The Procedure gives concrete structural rules (label A/B/C, pros/cons, verifiable DoD, commands in the plan) and the Example is fully copy-paste-ready with file paths, status codes, and specific steps covering the common case.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear five-step sequence (Problem → Options → Recommendation → DoD → Implementation Plan) is paired with an explicit Verification checklist and a revision feedback loop when the user picks a different option.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

This single-purpose communication skill has no need for external references (none exist), and its content is organized into clearly headed, easily navigable sections, satisfying the simple-skill exception for progressive disclosure.

5 / 5

Total

20

/

20

Passed

Description

61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is concise and names a distinct, recognizable format with its core structural parts, but omits any explicit "Use when" trigger guidance, capping completeness, and could be enriched with more natural synonyms.

Suggestions

Add a "Use when..." clause naming natural triggers (e.g., "Use when the user asks for a 1-3-1, wants options with trade-offs, or needs a decision proposal to forward to stakeholders").

Broaden trigger-term coverage with synonyms like "trade-offs," "proposal," and "recommendation."

Reflect the fuller output (recommendation with rationale, definition of done, implementation plan) to lift specificity.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names the domain ("1-3-1 decision briefs") and lists its concrete structural components ("problem, three options, one pick"), but does not comprehensively enumerate the fuller capabilities (recommendation rationale, DoD, implementation plan) present in the body.

3 / 5

Completeness

It gives a clear "what" ("1-3-1 decision briefs: problem, three options, one pick") but includes no "Use when..." / "when" trigger guidance, which the rubric caps at 3.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

It includes the natural trigger phrase "1-3-1" plus "decision briefs" and "options" that users would actually say, but misses common synonyms like "proposal," "trade-offs," or "recommendation."

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"1-3-1 decision briefs" is a distinctly named format with a specific trigger, giving minimal overlap with other skills, though the trigger surface is somewhat narrow.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Validation

81%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation13 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

metadata_field

'metadata' should map string keys to string values

Warning

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

13

/

16

Passed

Repository
NousResearch/hermes-agent
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.