CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

parallel-cli

Agent-native web search, deep research, and enrichment.

55

Quality

63%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Critical

Do not install without reviewing

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./optional-skills/research/parallel-cli/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a strong, action-oriented CLI reference with executable examples and clear multi-step workflows for each capability. Main improvements would be consolidating repeated guidance and making validation steps concrete.

Suggestions

Consolidate the repeated 'prefer Hermes native tools' and paid-tier reminders into a single 'When to use' section to remove redundancy.

Make validation explicit by adding a concrete check command (e.g., how to verify enriched.csv succeeded) rather than only stating 'Validate the output file before reporting success'.

Consider moving the per-subcommand flag detail into a reference file if the file grows further, keeping SKILL.md as a tight overview.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly lean executable commands with little concept-explanation, though the 'prefer Hermes native tools' and paid-tier reminders are repeated across several sections and could be consolidated.

4 / 5

Actionability

Abundant copy-paste-ready commands with real flags cover each subcommand's common cases (search, extract, research, enrich, findall, monitor), matching the fully-executable anchor.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Numbered workflows (launch --no-wait -> poll -> summarize; enrich inspect -> suggest -> run -> validate) and an exit-code error-recovery loop provide clear sequencing with checkpoints, though validation steps are stated more than concretely commanded.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist, but the single file is well-organized with clear section headers and a quick-reference command tree for navigation; inlining is reasonable for a concise command catalog, with only minor organization gaps.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

45%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly states the capability domain but lacks concrete actions and any explicit trigger guidance, capping completeness and distinctiveness. Adding a 'Use when...' clause with natural trigger terms would materially raise the score.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause naming natural triggers (e.g., 'Use when the user asks for deep research, web-scale entity discovery, or data enrichment beyond a simple lookup').

Replace the noun-phrase list with concrete verbs/actions (e.g., 'Runs web searches, launches async deep-research jobs, and enriches CSV/JSON data').

Include synonyms/file-formats users might say (e.g., 'web search', 'look up online', 'deep research', 'enrichment', 'entity discovery') to improve trigger term coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names the domains ("web search, deep research, and enrichment") as noun phrases but lists no concrete actions or verbs, matching the anchor where the domain is named but actions are minimal or generic.

2 / 5

Completeness

It gives a clear "what" ("Agent-native web search, deep research, and enrichment") but no "when"/trigger guidance; per the rubric a missing 'Use when...' clause caps completeness at 3.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

"web search" and "deep research" are natural user phrases while "enrichment" is more technical, but common synonyms and variations are missing, fitting the anchor for some relevant keywords with gaps.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The "Agent-native" qualifier and named niche add some specificity, but "web search" broadly overlaps native tools (the body itself flags this overlap), so it could still trigger for the wrong skill.

3 / 5

Total

11

/

20

Passed

Validation

81%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation13 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

metadata_field

'metadata' should map string keys to string values

Warning

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

13

/

16

Passed

Repository
NousResearch/hermes-agent
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.