Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplary lean overview: it captures only Polymarket-specific gotchas (double-encoded fields, token IDs, probability semantics, rate limits) and delegates the endpoint reference appropriately. Its main gap is navigation — the bundled scripts/polymarket.py is never referenced, and the workflow lacks empty-results/pagination handling.
Suggestions
Mention scripts/polymarket.py in the body (e.g. a one-line "Ready-made queries: scripts/polymarket.py") so Claude knows it exists and when to use it instead of hand-rolling requests.
Add a brief step for empty or paginated search results (e.g. "if no results, refine the query; if hasMore is true, page with offset"), matching the pagination fields documented in the reference.
Include one inline example GET request (curl or Python) for the search step so the core path is executable without opening the reference file.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every section carries Polymarket-specific knowledge Claude cannot infer (double-encoded outcomePrices/clobTokenIds, prices-as-probabilities, USDC volume, rate limits) with zero padding or explanation of known concepts. Matches anchor 5: lean and efficient, every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete hostnames, named endpoints, field semantics, an executable parse line (json.loads(market['outcomePrices'])), and a concrete output format example ("65.2% Yes ($1.2M volume)"). Falls short of anchor 5 because the body contains no complete copy-paste example request — an actual GET/curl example is delegated entirely to the reference file. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 4-step workflow (Search → Parse → Present → Deep dive) is clearly sequenced with the correct API/field mapped to each step (clobTokenIds for orderbook, conditionId for history). Not anchor 5 because there are no checkpoints for error/edge cases — e.g. empty search results or the hasMore pagination shown in the reference; read-only usage means the destructive-operation cap does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-sectioned and clearly signals references/api-endpoints.md (which exists, one level deep), but the actual bundle also contains scripts/polymarket.py (284 lines, over half the bundle) that is never mentioned anywhere in the body, making it undiscoverable. This falls between anchor 3 (organization gaps around references) and anchor 4 (mostly appropriate placement) — the orphaned script keeps it below 4. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |