Content
90%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplar of lean, executable guidance: concrete commands with real flags, explicit checkpoints, and security-critical details (never print the PAN, use --output-file). The only soft spots are the absence of an explicit error-recovery loop and the lack of any progressive-disclosure bundle despite a few sections that could be split out.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every section is commands, decision tables, gates, or non-obvious pitfalls; no concepts Claude already knows are explained, and there is no padding (e.g. "Wraps @stripe/link-cli so Hermes can complete purchases..." goes straight to what matters). | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Every step is a copy-paste-ready command with concrete flags (e.g. the full `link-cli spend-request create` invocation, `mpp decode --challenge`, `--output-file` for card retrieval), and the credential-type decision table covers the common merchant cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 7-step numbered sequence with an explicit auth gate ("Do not proceed past this step until `auth status` confirms login"), user confirmation before spending, and a Verification section, but no explicit error-recovery loop (e.g. what to do on retrieve failure or approval timeout), which matters for a money-moving workflow. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the body is well-sectioned, leaning on CLI-native discovery (`link-cli --llms-full`, `--schema`) instead of inlining reference material; minor gaps such as the optional MCP-server section that could live in a separate reference file. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |