Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable skill body that assumes competence, leads with executable code, and cleanly offloads detail to real reference files. The only gap is the absence of an explicit validation step in the add-event workflow.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean body with a quick-reference table, terse critical rules, and tight code blocks; assumes Claude's competence and avoids explaining what analytics or decorators are, matching the 'every token earns its place' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready TypeScript for creating a scene, registering it in a scope, and calling it from business code, plus a decorator-types table covering the common cases, matching the top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 'Adding a Server Event' section gives a clear numbered 3-step sequence with a Critical Rules checklist; not a 5 because there is no explicit validation/verification step (e.g., confirming the event fires in Mixpanel) despite the strong sequencing. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The Quick Reference table signals one-level-deep references to real files (adding-events.md, architecture.md, pitfalls.md, all present under references/rules/) with key-file hints, while keeping the body an overview, matching the top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |