Content
61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise and well-structured with a real, clearly signaled reference, but it omits in-body validation for a destructive/batch workflow and leaves the central config-edit steps as high-level directions rather than concrete edits. Adding a validation checkpoint and concrete edit snippets (or pulling them forward from the reference) would materially improve it.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation/verification checkpoint before the commit-and-push step in the body (e.g., run the reference's Validation Checklist) to satisfy the destructive/batch workflow requirement.
Include concrete before/after edit snippets for at least one config file in the body, or explicitly state the edits are copy-paste ready in the referenced guide, so the core action is executable without opening the reference.
Remove the redundancy between Step 4's enumerated file list and the 'Files to Modify' table, or merge them, to tighten token efficiency.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with well-organized sections and executable bash blocks, but the intro repeats the description and the 'Files to Modify' table duplicates Step 4's file list, minor padding that keeps it just below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Git and build-number bash commands are executable, but the core task — editing six config files — is given only as high-level directions ('Set VERSION', 'Hardcode BUILD_NUMBER in... step') with no concrete edited snippets in the body, so key execution details are missing. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1-5 are clearly sequenced, but this is a destructive/batch operation modifying six files and pushing a branch, and the body has no validation checkpoint; the validation checklist lives only in the reference, so workflow clarity is capped at 3 per the rubric. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Structure is clear with well-signaled one-level-deep reference to references/rules/upgrade-test-version.md (a real file), but the body inlines the full workflow that the reference also covers, a minor organization gap versus ideal content splitting. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |