Content
53%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body presents a clear, well-sequenced workflow and correctly delegates deep detail to a real reference file, but it is held back by systematic internal duplication and by the absence of any validation checkpoint for a batch operation that rewrites six CI/build config files and pushes a branch. Tightening the duplicated sections and surfacing (or at least pointing to) the validation checklist before the push step would lift most dimensions.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation checkpoint before Step 5 (or reference the reference file's Validation Checklist), e.g., "Verify all six files updated and BUILD_NUMBER matches across workflows before pushing."
Remove the duplicated content: drop the "Files to Modify" table or Step 4's annotated list (keep one), and fold the Quick Reference formula into Step 2 instead of stating it twice.
Fix the "Related Skills" section, which lists "/1k-dev-commands" twice with different descriptions, and either distinguish the two intended skills or merge into one entry.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The Quick Reference section repeats the build-number formula and version pattern that Steps 1-2 already state, the "Files to Modify" table restates Step 4's entire list, and "Related Skills" lists "/1k-dev-commands" twice. This is 'mostly efficient but could be tightened', not 4, because the duplication is systematic rather than a couple of trimmable phrases. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Steps 2, 3, and 5 give executable bash, but Step 4 — the core task — offers only directives like "Set VERSION to test version", "Update version in outputs section", and "Update versionCode" with no exact edits in the body. This matches 'some concrete guidance but incomplete; missing key details'; it is not 4 because the body's central step lacks copy-paste-ready content (the exact edits live only in the reference file). | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The five steps are clearly sequenced, but this is a batch operation (modifying six configuration files and pushing a branch) with no validation or verification step anywhere in the body — the validation checklist exists only in the reference file. Per the judging guidelines, a batch workflow without validation is capped at 3; it stays at 3 rather than 2 because the sequence itself is well defined. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body links one real, one-level-deep reference ([upgrade-test-version.md](references/rules/upgrade-test-version.md)) under a clearly signaled "Detailed Guide" heading with a topics-covered list, and sections are well organized. It falls short of 5 because the body substantially duplicates the reference's workflow (formula, file list, steps) instead of cleanly splitting overview from detail. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |