Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is actionable and well-structured with clear references, but minor verbosity, a dangling script reference, and slight overlap with bundled guides keep it just below the top anchors.
Suggestions
Replace the 'use script in skill directory' delta hint with an inline jq/jq-based calculation or remove it, since no such script exists in the bundle.
Trim the restated success criteria and the 'Important Notes' list, consolidating into the existing decision tree to reduce token overhead.
De-duplicate the derive-session analysis sections that also appear in references/perf_tool_guide.md so the body points rather than repeats.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean and operational, but the Important Notes section and restated success criteria add tokens that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides executable jq pipelines, CLI commands, perfMark usage, and git snippets, but references a non-existent 'script in skill directory' for delta calculation. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear phased sequence with a decision tree, iteration cap, and keep/revert feedback loop, though build-success validation before measurement is only implicit and delta comparison is partly manual. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-signaled one-level-deep references to template.md and perf_tool_guide.md with detail correctly offloaded, though some analysis detail overlaps with the perf_tool_guide reference. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |