Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable with a clear, well-validated iterative workflow and good progressive disclosure into two reference files. The main weakness is moderate redundancy that could be tightened for token efficiency.
Suggestions
De-duplicate the success criteria: state them once in Step 2.3's decision tree and reference them from the Overview rather than restating verbatim.
Trim 'Important Notes' items that restate earlier steps (e.g. the commit-rule and critical-path notes) and consolidate the 'Maximum iterations: 10' mention to a single location.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is action-dense with concrete commands, but success criteria are duplicated (Overview and Step 2.3), 'Maximum iterations: 10' is stated twice, and the 'Important Notes' section partly restates earlier guidance. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides extensive copy-paste-ready bash and TypeScript with concrete file paths and clearly parameterized placeholders, covering the common cases (derive-session, jq extraction, git branch/commit, perfMark usage). | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequences work across Phases 1-3 with an explicit decision tree (>=10% time / >=20% call reduction), a revert-on-no-improvement feedback loop, a max-iteration cap, and validation checkpoints. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Two clearly-signaled one-level-deep references (references/template.md, references/perf_tool_guide.md) are linked from a References section and inline, and phases are well organized; the main body is fairly dense with minor organization gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |