Content
92%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable and token-efficient, with a clear enable-validate-interpret workflow and concrete executable commands throughout. Its only weakness is progressive disclosure: everything lives in one long SKILL.md with no split into reference files, even though parts (example log, parsing scripts, caveats) would benefit from being one level deep.
Suggestions
Split the 'What shows up in the log when enabled' example log and the 'Parsing script (quick aggregation)' commands into a separate reference file (e.g. PARSING.md), keeping SKILL.md as a lean overview that links to it one level deep.
Move the 'Caveats' and the per-layer 'Interpreting the numbers' detail into a reference (e.g. INTERPRETATION.md) so the main body focuses on enable + validate + diagnose workflow.
Add a short 'Quick start' section near the top that gives the minimal enable→grep→interpret path, with deeper sections linked below for progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and assumes Claude's competence — Metro, Hermes bytecode (HBC), split-bundle, and MMKV are used without primer-level explanation, and the explanations that do appear (self vs total, __r vs __d, pre-warm side effect) are tool-specific non-obvious details that earn their place; it is not level 2 because there is no generic concept padding to tighten away. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready guidance — 'export ONEKEY_STARTUP_PROFILE=1', 'yarn app:android', 'eas build --profile profile-startup --platform android', eas.json/Info.plist snippets, and grep/awk parsing scripts; it is not level 2 because the code and commands are complete rather than pseudocode or abstract direction. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The enable→build→run→check sequence is clear and includes an explicit validation checkpoint with an error-recovery feedback loop (the 'Cross-platform check' missing→likely cause→fix table); it is not level 2 because validation steps are explicit, not merely implicit or absent. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is well-organized with clear headers, tables, and section separators, but it is a single ~200-line monolithic file with all detail inline and no offloading into bundle reference files; it is not level 3 because content such as the example log dump, parsing scripts, and caveats could be split into one-level-deep references, and not level 1 because organization and navigation within the file are solid and there are no deeply nested references. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |