Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured, actionable skill: it enforces a mandatory file organization, gives explicit decision criteria for the two sanctioned atom patterns, and provides executable templates with real paths. The main weaknesses are mild redundancy across sections and a few implied steps (EAtomNames registration, actions.ts conventions) that a newcomer would have to reverse-engineer.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly tight — location lists, forbidden patterns, and code templates with no padding or explanation of what Jotai/React is — but locations are restated between the organization and selection sections, and the useAtom/useAtomValue/useSetAtom snippet is basic Jotai knowledge Claude already has. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Copy-paste-ready templates for both globalAtom and contextAtom, with exact file paths and the directory layout for contexts, give concrete executable guidance; the gap that keeps it below a 5 is that registering a name in EAtomNames/atomNames.ts and the actions.ts convention are referenced but never shown. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The core decision (globalAtom vs contextAtom) is governed by explicit, unambiguous criteria lists, and no destructive or batch operations require validation; it is not a 5 because the full create→register-name→export→wire-up sequence has implicit steps (e.g., the EAtomNames registration is never sequenced). | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the ~90-line body is self-contained with clear section headers and appropriately inlined examples; it misses a 5 only because it exceeds the under-50-line simple-skill threshold while inlining content (e.g., usage examples) that could live in a reference file. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |