CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

1k-tradingview-communication

OneKey TradingView bridge communication for WebView/iframe messages, K-line data, marks, Perps symbols/lines, order events, and websocket recovery.

59

Quality

68%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.skillshare/skills/1k-tradingview-communication/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is highly actionable and well-sequenced with strong verification checkpoints, but it inlines a large amount of reference-grade detail in a single file rather than splitting it across supporting bundle files.

Suggestions

Extract the long Search Anchors and per-message Message Contracts into reference files (e.g. references/anchors.md, references/message-contracts.md) and link them one level deep from SKILL.md.

Add a short Quick Start or summary section at the top so the overview is skimmable before the detailed contracts.

Move the repo-specific verification commands into a references/verification.md or scripts entry to keep the main body lean.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is dense and information-rich, assuming Claude's competence with TradingView concepts and avoiding basic explanations; a few message-contract code blocks repeat structure that could be tightened, but it is largely efficient.

4 / 5

Actionability

It provides concrete, copy-paste-ready message payloads, exact symbol/method constants, and named functions to locate with `rg`, giving fully executable guidance across the common bridge cases.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The Change Checklist gives a clearly sequenced multi-step process with explicit validation checkpoints and a dedicated Verification section (lint, build, `yarn agent:check`, local dev testing), including feedback-loop guidance for bridge changes.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The content is well-sectioned but entirely monolithic within SKILL.md with no bundle files; the detailed per-message contracts and anchor lists could live in separate reference files, and there are no one-level-deep references to navigate.

3 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

52%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific and clearly distinct within a niche domain, but it is written in internal jargon rather than natural trigger terms and omits an explicit 'when to use' clause.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause, e.g. 'Use when modifying the OneKey TradingView chart bridge or tracing messages between the app and chart.'

Add natural trigger terms users would actually say (e.g. 'TradingView chart', 'chart bridge messages', 'K-line/marks syncing').

Prefer third-person action verbs ('Bridges', 'Routes') to frame the capabilities as concrete actions.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain (OneKey TradingView bridge communication) and several concrete capabilities (K-line data, marks, Perps symbols/lines, order events, websocket recovery), giving broad but not fully enumerated coverage.

4 / 5

Completeness

It clearly states what the skill does (bridge communication across listed features) but provides no explicit 'Use when...' trigger guidance, which caps completeness at 3 per the guidelines.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

The terms are largely internal jargon (OneKey, WebView/iframe, Perps, K-line) with no natural user-facing phrases or synonyms a person would say; the natural triggers ('TradingView', 'chart messages') are minimal.

2 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The OneKey TradingView bridge niche is highly specific with distinct technical triggers, so conflict risk with other skills is minimal.

5 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

allowed_tools_field

'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s)

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
OneKeyHQ/app-monorepo
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.