CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

claude-code

Delegate coding work to Claude Code CLI for repository edits, reviews, and multi-turn implementation sessions.

63

Quality

76%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/agents/claude-code/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a concise, highly actionable guide to delegating work to the Claude Code CLI, with executable commands, clear use/avoid guidance, and explicit inspection checkpoints. Structure is clean, though it could trim minor redundancy between example sections.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence (no explanation of git/tmux basics), but there is minor redundancy between the Print Mode command blocks and the later Useful Commands section, keeping it just below anchor 5.

4 / 5

Actionability

Commands are copy-paste ready with real flags (--allowedTools, --max-turns, --output-format, -c, -r) and concrete tmux sequences, covering the common one-shot and interactive cases as anchor 5 requires.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Sequences are clear (tmux launch→send→capture→exit, worktree add→run→inspect) with explicit verification checkpoints ('Inspect the diff and test results before merging', 'Inspect Claude Code edits before committing them'), but a couple of validation steps are implicit rather than enforced.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Content is well-organized into clearly headed sections in a single file with no nested references and easy navigation; with no bundle files present and the body exceeding the simple-skill line count, it sits at anchor 4 rather than 5.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific and distinct, clearly conveying what the skill does and scoping it to Claude Code CLI delegation. Its main weakness is the absence of an explicit 'when to use' trigger clause, which limits completeness.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g. 'Use when the user wants to delegate coding work to Claude Code or needs an independent coding pass on a repo.'

Include a few more natural trigger terms users would say ('code review', 'diff review', 'delegate') to broaden keyword coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain (Claude Code CLI) and three concrete actions — 'repository edits, reviews, and multi-turn implementation sessions' — which exceeds the 1-2 action bar of anchor 3 but has minor coverage gaps versus anchor 5.

4 / 5

Completeness

The 'what' is clear (delegate coding work for edits/reviews/sessions), but there is no explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause, so per the judging guidelines 'when' is only weakly implied and completeness is capped at 3.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural terms like 'coding work', 'repository edits', 'reviews', and 'multi-turn implementation sessions' are present, but common variations a user might actually say ('code review', 'diff', 'delegate') are missing.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Scoped specifically to delegating to the Claude Code CLI, giving it a clear niche with distinct triggers and minimal conflict risk with other skills.

5 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

metadata_field

'metadata' should map string keys to string values

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository
Open-Curiosity/gini-agent
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.