Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with clear sequenced workflows and error-recovery checkpoints, but it carries some redundancy and keeps all reference material inline in one file.
Suggestions
Deduplicate the notes-vs-rules overlap (Rules 5–6 restate "When NOT to Use" items) to tighten conciseness.
Move the per-verb API reference into a one-level-deep REFERENCE.md and signal it from a concise Quick Reference to improve progressive disclosure.
Trim the Prerequisites and account-selection prose to the essential decision rules.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient with no concept-padding, but "When NOT to Use" items are restated as Rules 5–6 and the Prerequisites/Selecting an account prose is long enough that it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Commands like `gws drive files list --params '{"q":"name contains '\''Q1 budget'\''"}'` and `gws drive files export --params '...' -o ./doc.pdf` are concrete, executable, and copy-paste ready across every operation. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The setup flow is a numbered sequence with an explicit checkpoint ("Wait for the user's answer"), API failures (scope/401/ENOENT) route to an error-recovery flow, and destructive/batch ops get safety checkpoints (trash-before-delete, --page-limit). | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is a single ~168-line file with no references/scripts/assets bundle; sections are well-organized, but the API reference is monolithic and inline rather than split into one-level-deep reference files. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |