Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable with clean executable commands and good organization, but loses points for repeated token guidance, an off-topic migration section, and missing validation steps for mutating operations. Tightening redundancy and adding verify steps would raise it.
Suggestions
State the token requirement once and reference it, removing the duplicated explanations in 'Getting a Bear Token', 'Common Commands', and 'Notes'.
Remove or relocate the 'PilotDeck Migration Note' section, which is unrelated to executing the skill.
Add an explicit verification step after mutating operations (e.g. re-open the note with grizzly open-note to confirm appended text).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean and avoids explaining what Bear is, but the token requirement is repeated three times and the 'PilotDeck Migration Note' section is unrelated padding that does not earn its tokens. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable grizzly commands with real flags and examples are provided throughout, making them copy-paste ready. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Commands are organized into clearly labeled sections, but there is no explicit multi-step sequencing or validation checkpoint for mutating operations like add-text. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single cohesive SKILL.md is organized into clear, well-signaled sections with no nested or misplaced references, appropriate for a self-contained skill. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |