Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a lean, well-sequenced, actionable process skill with a strong verdict template and clear workspace guidance; its only real weakness is the appended PilotDeck migration metadata, which is noise relative to skill execution.
Suggestions
Remove the 'PilotDeck Migration Note' section (and its platform-specific temp path) from the operational skill body, or relocate it to non-skill review metadata.
Consider adding a one-line explicit validation/retry note in the Loop (e.g., if research shows the approach is not credible, restart at the Question step) to make the feedback loop explicit.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean and assumes Claude's competence, but the trailing 'PilotDeck Migration Note' (a platform-specific temp path and review metadata) is non-operational noise that does not earn its place, fitting the 'mostly efficient but could be tightened' anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives a concrete 5-step loop, a copy-paste verdict template, explicit workspace paths (`.tmp/openclaw-spikes/<slug>`, `spikes/<NNN-slug>/`), and a concrete avoid-list; as an instruction-only skill the guidance is fully actionable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The numbered Loop is a clear sequence with an explicit 'Stress: try one edge case or failure mode' checkpoint and a verdict gate, matching the 'clear sequence with explicit validation steps' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, single-purpose, needs no external references, and is organized into well-labeled sections, so progressive disclosure scores 3 per the simple-skills note. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |