Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a compact, well-organized instruction-only checklist with concrete criteria and a defined output format; its only real weakness is minor non-functional padding (the migration note) and a few subjective checklist items.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with concise one-line checklist items and a brief output spec, but the 'PilotDeck Migration Note' section and the slightly redundant intro line ('helps the agent review whether the interface is usable, readable, responsive, and polished') are tokens that could be trimmed, so it stops short of the 5 'every token earns its place' anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | For an instruction-only skill, the checklist gives concrete checkable criteria (e.g. 'keyboard focus, labels, alt text, contrast, reduced motion') and a defined output format, but a few items remain subjective ('feel consistent', 'no random palette mixing'), leaving minor gaps below the fully executable 5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The single review-then-report action is largely unambiguous with a specified output, and since this is a non-destructive read-only review the destructive/batch validation cap does not apply; it falls just short of 5 because there is no suggested ordering or prioritization for working through the eight checklist areas. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, needs no external references (none provided), and is organized into clear, well-signaled sections (Checklist, Output, Migration Note), meeting the rubric's simple-skill exception for a top progressive_disclosure score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |