Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is lean and actionable with a complete executable code example and a concrete build command. The only gap is the absence of an explicit validation/verification step after running the Relay compiler.
Suggestions
Add an explicit verification step after `yarn relay`, e.g. run a typecheck (`yarn tsc --noEmit`) and confirm the generated `__generated__` types exist before considering the component done.
In Step 1, show the actual file-creation action (e.g. a path template or `touch` command) rather than only stating the location, so the step is as executable as Step 2.
Add a brief feedback loop: if `yarn relay` reports fragment or schema errors, fix the fragment and re-run before proceeding.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean: it assumes Claude knows Relay/GraphQL, gives a complete code example, and avoids padded explanation, so every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Step 2 provides a copy-paste-ready full component and Step 3 gives the concrete `yarn relay` command, covering the common case fully. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 0-3 are clearly sequenced and `yarn relay` acts as an implicit checkpoint, but there is no explicit validation or feedback loop (e.g. verify generated types); not a 5 for that gap, and not capped at 3 since this is not a destructive or batch operation. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no bundle files needed and well-organized Prerequisites/Procedure/Steps sections, qualifying for the top anchor under the simple-skill guideline. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |