aris-idea-discovery

Workflow 1: Full idea discovery pipeline. Orchestrates research-lit → idea-creator → novelty-check → research-review to go from a broad research direction to validated, pilot-tested ideas. Use when user says "找idea全流程", "idea discovery pipeline", "从零开始找方向", or wants the complete idea exploration workflow.

Quality

88%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Critical

Do not install without reviewing

Quality

Content

77%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-sequenced, highly actionable orchestrator with strong checkpoints and feedback loops, but it is verbose for its context budget and monolithic where splitting the inline report templates into reference files would improve progressive disclosure.

Suggestions

Move the inline REF_PAPER_SUMMARY.md, IDEA_REPORT.md, and IDEA_CANDIDATES.md markdown templates into reference files (e.g. references/REPORT_TEMPLATES.md) and link to them, reducing body length and improving progressive_disclosure.

Trim the repeated 'What this does' bullets under each phase, since the chained sub-skills already document their own behavior; keep only the orchestration-specific decisions and handoff points.

Consolidate the per-phase checkpoint dialog blocks into a single reusable checkpoint convention to cut token cost while preserving the validation gates.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	It avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but ~316 lines include verbose inline report templates (REF_PAPER_SUMMARY.md, IDEA_REPORT.md, IDEA_CANDIDATES.md) and repeated 'What this does' bullets that re-explain sub-skills, fitting the score-2 anchor of mostly efficient but could be tightened rather than the score-3 lean ideal.	2 / 3
Actionability	Gives concrete, copy-paste-ready sub-skill invocations with arguments (e.g. `/aris-research-lit "$ARGUMENTS"`, `/aris-novelty-check "[top idea 1 description]"`), explicit constants (PILOT_MAX_HOURS=2), and named output files, matching the score-3 anchor for fully executable, specific guidance.	3 / 3
Workflow Clarity	Sequences a clear multi-phase pipeline (Phase 0 → 5.5) with explicit '🚦 Checkpoint' gates, branching user-decision logic, and feedback loops (re-run Phase 1/2 until satisfied), matching the score-3 anchor for clear sequencing with validation steps and error-recovery loops.	3 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	No bundle/reference files exist and the ~316-line body keeps full report templates inline that could be split into separate reference files, fitting the score-2 anchor of some structure but content that should be separate is inline rather than the score-3 one-level-deep reference pattern.	2 / 3
	Total	10 / 12 Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is strong: it states concrete pipeline actions, gives explicit natural-language triggers in both English and Chinese, and clearly distinguishes when to use this skill. It uses third person throughout, incurring no voice penalty.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Lists multiple concrete actions: it 'Orchestrates research-lit → idea-creator → novelty-check → research-review' to 'go from a broad research direction to validated, pilot-tested ideas', matching the score-3 anchor for listing several specific concrete actions rather than just naming a domain.	3 / 3
Completeness	Explicitly answers both 'what' (orchestrates a multi-stage pipeline from broad direction to validated pilot-tested ideas) and 'when' via a literal 'Use when user says...' clause, matching the score-3 anchor that requires both with explicit triggers.	3 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	Provides good coverage of natural phrases a user would say — '找idea全流程', 'idea discovery pipeline', '从零开始找方向', and 'complete idea exploration workflow' — covering both English and Chinese variants, matching the score-3 anchor for natural-term coverage.	3 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Targets a clear niche (full idea discovery pipeline) with distinctive multilingual trigger phrases unlikely to fire for unrelated skills, matching the score-3 anchor for a clear niche with distinct triggers and low conflict risk.	3 / 3
	Total	12 / 12 Passed

Validation

87%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
allowed_tools_field	'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s)	Warning
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	14 / 16 Passed

Repository: OpenLAIR/dr-claw
Path: skills/aris-idea-discovery/SKILL.md
Commit: 6da7f7c

Reviewed: about 8 hours ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.