Content
70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill body is highly actionable with a clear, well-validated workflow and strong feedback loops. It is somewhat verbose and monolithic, inlining reference material that would benefit from being split into separate files.
Suggestions
Move the Math Formulas (KaTeX) reference, CVPR/ICLR academic style guide, and Architecture junction techniques into separate reference files (e.g., references/math.md, references/academic-style.md) referenced from SKILL.md to improve progressive disclosure.
Trim or remove the diagram-type use-case column ('Processes, decisions, steps') since Claude already knows what each diagram type is for.
Replace generic style platitudes in the academic guide ('clean white background', 'sans-serif fonts') with only the non-obvious specifics, or move them to the reference file.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and dense, but the diagram-type use-case table and parts of the academic style guide re-explain concepts Claude already knows and could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste bash commands (mkdir, mmdc), complete Mermaid examples, and a KaTeX syntax table; minor gaps are the templated <diagram-name> placeholders. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 0-6 are clearly sequenced with a mandatory mmdc verification step, an explicit fix-rerun-retry feedback loop (MAX_ITERATIONS=3), and a strict review checklist. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist; all reference material (math syntax, academic style guide, architecture junction techniques, full diagram-type table) is inlined in one ~400-line file with sections but no file-level split. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |