Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured orchestration skill: concrete commands, sequenced phases with validation gates, and a review feedback loop. Its only weakness is verbosity — some checkpoint templates and the timeline table are non-essential.
Suggestions
Drop or condense the emoji checkpoint message templates; they are presentation sugar, and Claude can format phase summaries without literal templates.
Remove the Typical Timeline table (or move it to a reference); duration estimates are fragile and add tokens that do not change what Claude does.
Tighten the Phase 6 Final Report block to a short bullet list of required fields instead of a full markdown template.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient and does not explain concepts Claude already knows, but the full emoji checkpoint templates (e.g. "📐 Paper plan complete:") and the Typical Timeline table are padding that could be trimmed without losing guidance. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Gives exact, copy-paste-ready slash commands per phase (e.g. `/aris-paper-plan "$ARGUMENTS"`), concrete constants (VENUE, MAX_IMPROVEMENT_ROUNDS), named output files, and the literal compile command `latexmk -pdf`. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The six phases are clearly sequenced with explicit checkpoints between them, hard gates ("Compilation must succeed before entering the improvement loop. Fix all errors first"), and a review→fix→recompile feedback loop in Phase 5. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-organized into clear one-level sections (Overview, Constants, Inputs, Pipeline phases, Key Rules) with external sub-skill references signalled once ("See /aris-paper-figure SKILL.md for details") rather than nested, and no bundle files need splitting. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |