Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable skill body: every phase is backed by executable commands verified against the real script, and the single script dependency is correctly disclosed. Weaknesses are minor — a redundant Overview paragraph and the absence of empty-results/error-handling guidance in the search workflow.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and command-first, but the Overview paragraph largely restates the frontmatter description (with a naming inconsistency: 'Semantic Scholar' vs 'paper cross-references'), and dependency notes like 'stdlib-adjacent, universally available' could be trimmed — matching anchor 4's 'minor instances of over-explanation'. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Every phase gives copy-paste-ready commands whose subcommands, flags, and defaults match the actual script CLI, plus a concrete example dataset id ('huggingface:stanfordnlp/imdb'), specified output paths, and a defined presentation table — fully executable and covering the common cases, matching anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The five phases are clearly sequenced with per-phase commands and a user-confirmation checkpoint before full downloads, but there are no checkpoints for empty search results or per-source API failures — anchor 4's 'clear sequence with most checkpoints; minor validation gaps' fits. The destructive/batch cap does not apply since all operations are read-only searches. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | All logic lives in the verified one-level-deep script reference (scripts/search_ml_datasets.py), and the ~80-line body is a well-organized overview with no content that belongs in separate reference files — appropriately split and easy to navigate, matching anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |