inno-idea-generation

Facilitates structured brainstorming sessions, conducts comprehensive research, and generates creative solutions using proven frameworks. Trigger keywords - brainstorm, ideate, research, SCAMPER, SWOT, mind map, creative, explore ideas, market research, competitive analysis, innovation, problem solving, feature generation

Quality

70%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/inno-idea-generation/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

50%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is well-structured with useful tables and sequenced workflows, but it is held back by missing referenced files, no validation checkpoints in batch workflows, and notable verbosity from illustrative transcripts and overlapping guidance sections.

Suggestions

Create the referenced bundle files (templates/brainstorm-session.template.md, templates/research-report.template.md, resources/brainstorming-techniques.md, resources/research-methods.md, REFERENCE.md) or remove the references.

Add explicit validation/feedback checkpoints to the Brainstorming and Research workflows (e.g., verify ideas meet the objective before extracting insights; re-run research when sources conflict).

Trim the two full illustrative example transcripts and merge the overlapping 'Best Practices' and 'Notes for LLMs' sections to reduce token overhead.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	Mostly efficient lists and tables, but padded with two long illustrative example transcripts, overlapping 'Best Practices' and 'Notes for LLMs' sections, and an extended Subagent Strategy section that could be trimmed.	3 / 5
Actionability	Quick Start gives executable bash commands backed by real scripts, but workflows repeatedly reference missing files (templates/brainstorm-session.template.md, templates/research-report.template.md, resources/*.md, REFERENCE.md), leaving key steps non-executable.	3 / 5
Workflow Clarity	Brainstorming and Research workflows are clearly numbered and sequenced, but lack validation checkpoints and feedback loops despite being batch operations, which caps the score per the rubric.	3 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	References are clearly signaled but point to non-existent files (resources/, templates/, REFERENCE.md), and the body is a ~440-line monolith inlining technique tables, full transcripts, and subagent strategy rather than splitting them out.	3 / 5
	Total	12 / 20 Passed

Description

91%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is strong: it states concrete capabilities and provides an explicit, comprehensive trigger-keyword clause answering both what and when. Minor overlap risk with general research/problem-solving skills keeps distinctiveness just below the top anchor.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the domain and several concrete actions ('Facilitates structured brainstorming sessions, conducts comprehensive research, and generates creative solutions using proven frameworks'), with only minor gaps versus the comprehensive anchor.	4 / 5
Completeness	Clearly answers both 'what' (facilitate brainstorming, research, generate solutions) and 'when' via an explicit 'Trigger keywords - ...' clause with concrete trigger phrases.	5 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Comprehensive natural keywords including synonyms and named frameworks ('brainstorm, ideate, research, SCAMPER, SWOT, mind map, creative, explore ideas, market research, competitive analysis'), matching the comprehensive-coverage anchor.	5 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The named-framework niche (SCAMPER, SWOT, structured brainstorming) is mostly distinct, but broad research/problem-solving terms create minor overlap risk with related skills.	4 / 5
	Total	18 / 20 Passed

Validation

87%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
allowed_tools_field	'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s)	Warning
relative_links	Relative link issues: 5 missing	Warning

	Total	14 / 16 Passed

Repository: OpenLAIR/dr-claw
Path: skills/inno-idea-generation/SKILL.md
Commit: 4b35756

Reviewed: 5 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.