CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

inno-idea-generation

Facilitates structured brainstorming sessions, conducts comprehensive research, and generates creative solutions using proven frameworks. Trigger keywords - brainstorm, ideate, research, SCAMPER, SWOT, mind map, creative, explore ideas, market research, competitive analysis, innovation, problem solving, feature generation

56

Quality

66%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/inno-idea-generation/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

50%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The skill provides genuinely executable scripts and a useful technique reference, but the body is padded with redundant principle lists and verbose transcripts, and it leans on several reference and template files that are not actually present in the bundle.

Suggestions

Remove or merge the redundant 'Best Practices' and 'Notes for LLMs' lists, and trim the 'Example Interactions' transcripts to concise before/after snippets to cut padding.

Create the referenced bundle files (resources/brainstorming-techniques.md, resources/research-methods.md, templates/brainstorm-session.template.md, templates/research-report.template.md, REFERENCE.md) or remove the broken links pointing to them.

Add an explicit validation/checkpoint step to the Brainstorming and Research workflows (e.g., confirm objective scope before executing, review generated ideas for actionability before documenting) so each sequence has a verify gate.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body has efficient core content (Quick Start commands, technique table), but 'Best Practices' (10 items) and 'Notes for LLMs' (10 items) largely restate each other, and the full 'Example Interactions' transcripts plus 'Integration with Other Skills' pad the skill with content Claude already knows.

2 / 3

Actionability

Three real, executable bash scripts with copy-paste commands and a detailed subagent prompt template are concrete, but the workflows also instruct saving via templates/brainstorm-session.template.md and templates/research-report.template.md that do not exist, leaving key guidance incomplete.

2 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The Brainstorming and Research workflows list clear sequenced steps, but neither includes explicit validation checkpoints or feedback loops, and the subagent coordination steps likewise lack verify-before-proceed gates.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Sections and one-level-deep links are signaled, but the body references six files (resources/*.md, templates/*.md, REFERENCE.md) that are absent from the actual bundle, and large blocks (example transcripts, subagent strategy, integration) are inline rather than split out.

2 / 3

Total

8

/

12

Passed

Description

82%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly communicates the skill's purpose and supplies a strong, explicit set of trigger keywords. Its main weakness is breadth and generic action verbs that invite overlap with adjacent research and problem-solving skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain and three actions ('Facilitates structured brainstorming sessions, conducts comprehensive research, and generates creative solutions'), but the verbs are generic and high-level rather than the granular concrete actions of a score-3 example.

2 / 3

Completeness

It states what the skill does up front and provides explicit 'Trigger keywords - ...' guidance, which is an equivalent explicit 'Use when' trigger clause answering both what and when.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

The 'Trigger keywords' list (brainstorm, ideate, research, SCAMPER, SWOT, mind map, creative, explore ideas, market research, competitive analysis, innovation, problem solving, feature generation) gives broad coverage of natural terms a user would actually say.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Distinctive anchors like SCAMPER, SWOT, and mind map give it a niche, but generic triggers (research, problem solving, innovation, creative) would overlap with many other skills.

2 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

allowed_tools_field

'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s)

Warning

relative_links

Relative link issues: 5 missing

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository
OpenLAIR/dr-claw
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.