Creates and manages project artifacts including project charters, Gantt-style timelines, RACI matrices, risk registers, and stakeholder communication plans. Tracks milestones, deadlines, resource allocation, and budget variance across cross-functional teams. Generates status reports, facilitates change control, and produces lessons-learned documentation. Use when a user needs to plan a new project, build a project plan or roadmap, track milestone progress, write a status update, conduct a risk assessment, allocate resources across teams, coordinate cross-functional delivery, or align stakeholders on scope, timeline, or budget changes.
93
92%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is an excellent skill description that thoroughly covers the project management domain with specific, concrete actions and artifacts. It includes a comprehensive 'Use when...' clause with multiple natural trigger scenarios. The description uses proper third-person voice throughout and balances detail with clarity, making it highly effective for skill selection among a large pool of available skills.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: creates project charters, Gantt-style timelines, RACI matrices, risk registers, stakeholder communication plans, tracks milestones/deadlines/resource allocation/budget variance, generates status reports, facilitates change control, and produces lessons-learned documentation. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (creates charters, timelines, RACI matrices, risk registers, etc.) and 'when' with an explicit 'Use when...' clause listing eight distinct trigger scenarios including planning projects, tracking milestones, writing status updates, and conducting risk assessments. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Excellent coverage of natural terms users would say: 'project plan', 'roadmap', 'milestone', 'status update', 'risk assessment', 'resource allocation', 'Gantt', 'RACI', 'stakeholder', 'budget', 'timeline', 'scope'. These are all terms a user would naturally use when requesting project management help. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Occupies a clear niche in project management with highly specific artifacts (RACI matrices, Gantt timelines, risk registers, project charters) that are unlikely to overlap with other skills. The domain-specific terminology creates strong differentiation. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a strong skill that provides highly actionable, well-structured project management guidance. The workflow is clearly sequenced with appropriate gates (intake validation, change control approval before updates), and the templates give Claude concrete output formats. Minor verbosity in the introductory section and some template placeholders that could be trimmed, but overall the content is well-calibrated for its complexity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is reasonably well-structured but includes some content that could be tightened. The templates, while useful, are somewhat verbose with placeholder patterns that Claude could infer. The 'What This Skill Does' section is unnecessary preamble. However, most content earns its place as project management requires specific structural guidance. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Highly actionable — provides complete, filled-in template skeletons with specific fields, concrete formatting (health indicators, variance notation like '+5 days vs. baseline'), and explicit rules for handling unknowns ([TBD — owner: <role>]). The change control process includes specific options and decision tracking. Every section tells Claude exactly what to produce. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 4-step workflow (Intake → Produce → Surface Decisions → Iterate) is clearly sequenced with explicit validation: Step 1 requires minimum inputs before proceeding, Step 2 mandates no generic placeholders, Step 3 forces surfacing blockers after every artifact, and the change control section explicitly gates updates behind approval ('Do not update milestones... until the change request is recorded as approved'). | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with a clear overview table mapping requests to outputs, compact template skeletons inline, and a reference to TEMPLATES.md for full filled-in examples. The structure uses headers, tables, and collapsible detail levels effectively. Navigation is straightforward with one-level-deep references. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Validation
90%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 10 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 10 / 11 Passed | |
010799b
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.