studio-producer
Creates strategic project plans, allocates team resources across concurrent projects, tracks milestones and portfolio ROI, and generates executive status reports and quarterly portfolio reviews for creative studios. Use when the user asks about planning a project portfolio, scheduling or assigning team resources, managing multiple concurrent projects, tracking deadlines and budgets, preparing stakeholder or board-level reports, coordinating cross-team work, or optimizing creative studio operations.
90
88%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
92%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a strong description that clearly articulates specific capabilities and provides comprehensive trigger guidance via an explicit 'Use when...' clause. The main weakness is moderate overlap risk with general project management or reporting skills, though the 'creative studios' domain qualifier helps narrow the scope. The description is well-structured, uses third person voice correctly, and balances detail with readability.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: creates strategic project plans, allocates team resources, tracks milestones and portfolio ROI, generates executive status reports and quarterly portfolio reviews. These are clearly defined capabilities. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (creates plans, allocates resources, tracks milestones, generates reports) and 'when' with an explicit 'Use when...' clause listing seven distinct trigger scenarios. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Excellent coverage of natural terms users would say: 'project portfolio', 'scheduling', 'assigning team resources', 'concurrent projects', 'deadlines and budgets', 'stakeholder reports', 'board-level reports', 'cross-team work', 'creative studio operations'. These are terms users would naturally use when seeking this kind of help. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | While the 'creative studios' niche adds some distinctiveness, many of the trigger terms (project planning, resource scheduling, tracking deadlines and budgets, stakeholder reports) are generic enough to overlap with general project management skills. The creative studio focus helps but doesn't fully eliminate conflict risk with broader PM or reporting skills. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured skill with clear workflows, explicit validation checkpoints, and good progressive disclosure through external template references. The actionability is strong with concrete decision rules, formulas, and checklists. Minor conciseness improvements could be made by trimming explanations of concepts Claude already understands (like ROI calculation) and tightening some of the descriptive text.
Suggestions
Remove the explicit ROI formula and basic explanations (e.g., tier definitions) that Claude already knows, to save tokens and improve conciseness.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is reasonably efficient but includes some explanations Claude wouldn't need (e.g., explaining what ROI stands for or how to calculate it, explaining what Tier 1/2 means). The decision rules table and validation checklist are well-structured but some items are slightly verbose. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides highly concrete guidance: specific formulas (ROI calculation), explicit validation checklists, a decision rules table with clear situation-action pairs, and concrete output expectations (real numbers, named individuals, specific dates). The templates are referenced with clear section breakdowns. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 5-step workflow is clearly sequenced with an explicit validation step (Step 3) containing a checklist with pass/fail criteria and instructions to resolve or flag failures. The decision rules table adds additional validation checkpoints for edge cases. Feedback loops are present (ask user if inputs missing, resolve or flag failed checks). | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill provides a clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references to two template files (PORTFOLIO_PLAN_TEMPLATE.md and QUARTERLY_REVIEW_TEMPLATE.md). Key sections of each template are summarized inline so Claude knows what to expect, while detailed templates are appropriately externalized. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Validation
90%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 10 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 10 / 11 Passed | |
- Repository
- OpenRoster-ai/awesome-agents
- Commit
010799b
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.