Content
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is strong: it provides concrete, executable Python for conditional filtering and styled Excel export in a lean, well-organized two-step structure with a signaled parent-skill reference. The main gap is the absence of validation/verification checkpoints around the export step.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is code-dense with only brief inline tips (e.g. '技巧：多条件组合筛选时使用 & 符号', 'errors=\'coerce\' 处理脏数据') and does not explain concepts Claude already knows, matching the 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place' anchor (3) rather than the 'mostly efficient but could be tightened' anchor (2). | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Both steps provide fully executable Python with real column names, a concrete regex pattern (r'--pct-'), openpyxl styling, and a copy-paste-ready download-link print, matching the 'fully executable code; copy-paste ready' anchor (3) rather than the pseudocode/incomplete anchor (2). | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Step1 and Step2 give a clear sequence, but there is no validation or verification checkpoint for the Excel export/styling batch operation (e.g. confirming the file was written or that filtered rows are non-empty), which per the rubric caps workflow clarity at 2 rather than 3. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is organized into two well-separated step sections with a clearly signaled one-level reference to the parent workflow SKILL.md (the 'Note' block) and no nested references, matching the 'clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references' anchor (3). | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |