Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-sequenced skill body with executable code, explicit validation checkpoints, and a clean one-level-deep reference structure verified against the actual bundle. Its only real weakness is verbosity from restated guard explanations and padded scope preambles.
Suggestions
Deduplicate the JSON-envelope status-guard prose (the '.result is null / use extract_json.py / return Error Flow' explanation is restated nearly verbatim in Step 1, Step 2.0, and Step 2.3) — state the pattern once and reference it.
Tighten the Step 1 'Scope (do not over-read the step name)' preamble; the anti-misinterpretation guidance is useful but currently padded and could be a short bullet list.
Add references/prompt-writing-rules.md (which exists in the bundle) to the References section so all present files are discoverable, or remove it if unused.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient and assumes Claude's competence — no generic concept explanations — but it is ~525 lines with redundancy: the JSON-envelope status-guard / literal-'null' / extract_json.py explanation is restated nearly verbatim in Step 1, Step 2.0, and Step 2.3, and the 'Scope (do not over-read the step name)' preamble is padded. This is above a 1 (it earns its tokens operationally) but could be tightened, matching the 'mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation' anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable bash snippets (sn_agent_runner.py invocations with exact flags), concrete parameter tables, and a precise JSON return contract with literal substitution rules — copy-paste ready with no pseudocode, matching the top anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are clearly sequenced (Step 0→4) with explicit validation checkpoints — `.status == ok` guards, Error Flow returns, an early-termination check, and a mandatory evaluation call — providing the feedback loops the rubric rewards for fragile/batch operations. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an orchestration overview pointing to one-level-deep references (references/*.md, references/layouts/, references/styles/) that are all verified to exist (87 layouts, 66 styles matching the stated counts), with a clear References section and explicit 'read only the selected file' guidance; navigation is easy and references are well signaled. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |