sn-ppt-entry

Use when a user asks to create a presentation, slide deck, PPT, or PPTX from a query and optional files, or to resume an existing SenseNova presentation task.

Quality

74%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/sn-ppt-entry/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-engineered orchestration skill: the workflow is clearly sequenced with strong validation and recovery loops, and commands are concrete and executable. It is held back by repeated path/rule emphasis and by inlining large schemas that would benefit from one-level-deep reference files.

Suggestions

Move the task_pack.json and info_pack.json schema blocks into a references/ file (e.g. references/task_pack.md) and link to it from SKILL.md to improve progressive disclosure.

Consolidate the repeated absolute-path / deck_dir derivation guidance (唯一目录规则, Box-Agent 兼容入口, 恢复规则) into a single authoritative section and reference it, reducing redundancy.

Tighten the 硬规则 list to only the rules not already enforced inline in the workflow steps to cut token cost without losing the constraints.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is dense and operational with no concept padding, but the absolute-path derivation rules, Box-Agent path warnings, and 硬规则 recap repeat guidance already stated earlier, so it could be tightened.	3 / 5
Actionability	Provides concrete, copy-pasteable commands (e.g. the parse_user_docs.py invocation with real flags, pwd -P, open_workbench.py) and full JSON schemas, with only minor gaps where steps are routing decisions rather than executable code.	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	The 13-step 新任务流程 is clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints (re-read disk outline.md, verify returned absolute paths, record parse failures), recovery feedback loops (re-run only missing artifacts), and a progress-feedback checklist.	5 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Headers give the document good structure and parse_user_docs.py is a real referenced bundle file, but the large task_pack.json/info_pack.json schemas and directory rules are inlined in SKILL.md with no references/ files to defer detail to, so content that should be separate stays inline.	3 / 5
	Total	15 / 20 Passed

Description

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, well-formed description with an explicit Use-when trigger clause, concrete presentation synonyms, and a clear niche. Its main weakness is specificity: it surfaces only create/resume and omits the routing and edit-handoff actions the skill performs.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the presentation domain and two concrete actions ("create a presentation, slide deck, PPT, or PPTX" and "resume an existing SenseNova presentation task"), but does not surface the routing/editing capabilities the body actually performs, so coverage is not comprehensive.	3 / 5
Completeness	Explicitly states both what it does (create/resume a presentation) and when to use it via a concrete "Use when a user asks to create..." clause with trigger phrases.	5 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Includes natural user terms — "presentation", "slide deck", "PPT", "PPTX" — with good synonym and extension coverage, though common variants like "slides", "deck", or "PowerPoint" are absent.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The SenseNova scoping and PPT/PPTX trigger phrasing give it a clear niche with minimal conflict risk, though "create a presentation" could still overlap with a generic slide skill.	4 / 5
	Total	16 / 20 Passed

Validation

75%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 12 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
metadata_version	'metadata.version' is missing	Warning
metadata_field	'metadata' should map string keys to string values	Warning
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning
referenced_paths_exist	Referenced path issues: 1 missing, 1 deeper-than-1-level	Warning

	Total	12 / 16 Passed

Repository: OpenSenseNova/SenseNova-Skills
Path: skills/sn-ppt-entry/SKILL.md
Commit: 5abde96

Reviewed: 10 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.