Conciseness

Dense, mostly-necessary instruction that assumes Claude's competence and avoids explaining known concepts; minor redundancy between the inline constraints and the '不得做' list could be trimmed.

Actionability

Provides concrete, specific guidance — exact files to read, task_pack.state fields to update, a copy-ready outline.md markdown template, and a three-round self-review checklist — with only minor gaps for an instruction-only skill.

Workflow Clarity

The '新建' section gives a clear 6-step sequence and the '三轮 Story 自审' supplies explicit validation/checklist before writing; error-recovery detail (how to handle a failed self-review round) is implicit rather than fully spelled out.

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized into clearly labeled sections (输入边界, 输出和状态, 工作方法, outline.md 格式, 新建与修改, 与出口的契约, 不得做) with all content appropriately inline and easy to navigate; no bundle files are present or needed.

Specificity

Names the concrete core action ('将 query、全部用户材料与已完成 Research 编排为唯一可编辑的 outline.md') plus explicit governance actions (stop and return to entry on missing prereqs, exit may not rewrite), giving several specific actions with minor coverage gaps.

Completeness

Explicitly states what it does (orchestrate inputs into the sole editable outline.md as a mandatory intermediate step) and when ('...时使用' after entry built DECK_DIR); the 'when' is concrete but tied to pipeline state rather than natural user phrasing.

Trigger Term Quality

Contains some relevant natural terms ('outline.md', '大纲', 'storyline' via triggers) but is dominated by internal jargon (DECK_DIR, task_pack.json, sn-ppt-entry, standard/dazzle/creative) and misses common user-facing synonyms.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear niche as the mandatory entry→exit intermediate step, explicitly distinguishing itself from sn-ppt-entry and downstream exit skills, with minimal conflict risk.