CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

sn-report-format-discovery

用于研究任务的最终呈现形式未知时。比较研究报告、学术论文、表格优先报表、决策备忘录或自定义形式,并用权威标准与真实范例支持推荐。

72

Quality

88%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

77%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is highly actionable and clearly workflow-driven with validation feedback loops, but it is a monolithic single file whose anchor registry and JSON schemas are inline rather than progressively disclosed, and some prose could be tighter.

Suggestions

Move the anchor registry (academic + industry anchors) and/or the full output JSON schemas into reference files under references/, linking to them one level deep from SKILL.md to improve progressive disclosure.

Tighten the core-principles and three-layer orthogonality explanations, which are restated across the "核心原则", "呈现形式判断", and "结构偏好强度" sections.

If the skill grows further, add a brief "Quick start" overview at the top so the dense operational detail is not the first thing loaded.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Largely operational with no padding of general knowledge, but repeated orthogonality explanations and the seven core-principle items could be tightened; some explanatory prose does not strictly earn its tokens.

2 / 3

Actionability

Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready search strings (e.g. `site:equator-network.org {report_type} reporting guideline`), a two-step journal-finding procedure, signal-detection tables, and exact JSON output schemas with field constraints.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Sequences the work in six numbered steps with an explicit validation checkpoint (步骤 4, is_primary_source), a discard-and-continue feedback loop, and concrete exit conditions plus a "不要做" guardrail list.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized into sections but everything is inline in a single ~360-line SKILL.md with no bundle files; the anchor registry and output schemas are content that could be split out and referenced one level deep.

2 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is concise, third-person, and answers both what and when with concrete candidate forms and an explicit trigger. It is distinctive and low conflict risk.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple specific concrete actions and forms — "比较研究报告、学术论文、表格优先报表、决策备忘录或自定义形式" and "用权威标准与真实范例支持推荐" — beyond naming only a domain.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly states both what (compare candidate forms and support a recommendation with standards/examples) and when ("用于研究任务的最终呈现形式未知时").

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Contains natural, varied terms a user would say (研究报告, 学术论文, 表格优先报表, 决策备忘录, 权威标准, 真实范例) alongside a clear trigger condition, giving good coverage.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear niche — final presentation-form discovery — with distinct triggers that are unlikely to overlap with content-research or planning skills.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
OpenSenseNova/SenseNova-Skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.