Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise, highly actionable with executable commands for every subcommand, and well structured around a clear workflow and a single real bundle script. Main improvements would be adding an explicit output-verification checkpoint and possibly splitting the command reference into a separate file.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and action-oriented with no conceptual padding (it does not explain what K-lines or financial statements are); command tables and examples earn their tokens, with only a couple of sentences that could be tightened, so it sits just below the fully-lean anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Every subcommand has copy-paste-ready, executable invocations (verified against the script's argparse subcommands), plus a command-to-purpose table and code-suffix normalization guidance, covering the common cases comprehensively. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 5-step workflow sequences confirm-market → script → browser-use cross-check → provenance-preserving output → stop on auth/paywall walls, with an explicit stop condition for risky sources; it lacks an explicit output-verification checkpoint, keeping it just below anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The single bundle file scripts/finance_search.py is real, correctly referenced, and one level deep; sections are well organized and cross-skill references (sn-search-year-report, search-market) are clearly signaled, with only minor inline-command-reference bulk that could arguably live in a separate doc. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |