CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

trend-analysis

基于多维度数据进行分级评估与趋势预测,通过设定差异化增长率计算预测值,并生成对比可视化图表,适用于绩效评估、目标设定等场景。

60

Quality

69%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/sn-da-excel-workflow/capability/excel-data-analysis/trend-analysis/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

80%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is highly actionable with fully executable code and a clean step sequence, and is appropriately self-contained for a simple skill. Its main weakness is the absence of any validation or verification checkpoints across the data-processing workflow.

Suggestions

Add validation between steps: after loading data, assert expected columns exist and the DataFrame is non-empty before proceeding.

Insert a verification checkpoint before visualization, e.g. print/inspect the forecast table and confirm growth rates mapped correctly to all rows.

Add a guard for the division in Step 3 and edge cases such as empty groups or missing values to make the batch operation more robust.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is code-forward with terse, useful inline comments and minimal prose padding; it could trim a couple of explanatory comments but is mostly efficient, fitting the 'efficient; minor trim' anchor above the verbose midpoint.

4 / 5

Actionability

All four steps provide fully executable, copy-paste-ready pandas/matplotlib code with concrete thresholds, column mappings, and chart configuration covering the common cases.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Steps 1-4 are clearly sequenced, but there are no validation or verification checkpoints (e.g. checking data shape/columns, confirming forecasts, verifying the chart rendered); per the batch-operation guidance, missing validation caps this at 3.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

This is a self-contained ~100-line single-purpose skill with no bundle files, organized into four well-labeled Step sections; per the simple-skill exception, well-organized sections without external references merit a 5.

5 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

58%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description concretely states what the skill does with specific actions, but it lacks an explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause, capping completeness at 3. Trigger term coverage is decent but missing natural user phrasings.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause naming concrete triggers, e.g. 'Use when performing performance reviews, setting growth targets, or forecasting from multi-dimensional metrics.'

Include natural trigger terms users would say, such as '绩效评估', '趋势预测', 'KPI 增长率设定', and likely input contexts (Excel data).

Briefly state the expected input/output (Excel data → forecast values and comparison charts) to sharpen distinctiveness.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists several concrete actions — '分级评估与趋势预测', '设定差异化增长率计算预测值', '生成对比可视化图表' — with only minor coverage gaps (no mention of inputs/outputs), matching the 'several specific actions' anchor.

4 / 5

Completeness

Provides a clear 'what' (multi-dimensional graded assessment, trend forecasting, visualization) but has no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent trigger guidance, which caps completeness at 3 per the judging guidelines.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes relevant scenario terms like '绩效评估、目标设定' but lacks the natural 'Use when' phrasing a user would say and omits common synonyms/file types, so it sits at 'some relevant keywords but missing common variations'.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The combination of graded assessment with differentiated growth rates and comparison charts carves a fairly distinct niche with only minor overlap risk against general data-analysis skills.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
OpenSenseNova/SenseNova-Skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.