Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-engineered skill body: project-specific invariants (version-chain rules, never-renumber rule, provider quirks) are tabulated concisely, code examples are nearly copy-paste ready, and detail is properly pushed to two real reference files. Remaining improvements are small: remove the intro/version-chain duplication, replace the placeholder in the first code example, and add a brief failure-recovery step to the test workflow.
Suggestions
Fold the intro paragraph's version-chain explanation into 'The version-chain rule' section to remove the duplication and trim tokens.
Make the Step 1 CreateAsync example fully executable (replace '// ... define schema ...' with a real statement) or drop the skeletal example in favor of the complete one in Step 3.
Add a short error-recovery step after Step 5's tests (e.g., what to inspect and re-run when an UpdateFromX fails on a provider).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense — rules in tables, complete code blocks, terse gotchas — and explains only OrchardCore-specific behavior Claude cannot be assumed to know ('OrchardCore discovers its methods by reflection and runs them sequentially, per tenant'). Not a 5 because of minor redundancy: the intro paragraph restates the version chain that 'The version-chain rule' section then tabulates, and the opening line 'This skill guides you through...' is boilerplate that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Mostly executable guidance: a complete class skeleton with usings and DI, the registration one-liner 'services.AddDataMigration<Migrations>();', a full AlterPartDefinitionAsync example, and a full UpdateFrom1Async body. Not a 5 because the first CreateAsync example is a template with a '// ... define schema ...' placeholder, and the Quick Reference tables give API names rather than runnable calls. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 5-step workflow is clearly sequenced and includes explicit validation — Step 5 requires testing a fresh install, an upgrade from the previous version, and every targeted provider (SQLite/SQL Server/MySQL/PostgreSQL) with a provider-quirk guard. This satisfies the validation requirement for schema-changing batch operations, so no cap applies. Not a 5 because there is no error-recovery feedback loop (what to do when a test fails beyond the try/catch note). | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear overview structure with two well-signaled, one-level-deep references that exist on disk ('references/patterns.md — content definition changes, content-item data patching, recipe migrations'; 'references/schema-builder.md — index tables, columns, indexes, provider quirks'), plus targeted inline pointers in Step 5 and Gotchas. The body keeps core rules and quick-reference tables inline while details live in the reference files — appropriately split and easy to navigate. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |