Conciseness

The body is largely table-dense and imperative, but 'planning files go in your project directory' is repeated three times (location table, the note after Quick Start, and the anti-patterns row), and the 'Context Window = RAM / Filesystem = Disk' section explains a concept Claude already knows — fitting the 'mostly efficient but some unnecessary explanation' anchor rather than the merely-trimmable anchor 4.

Actionability

Provides concrete, runnable invocations for session-catchup.py --metadata (bash and PowerShell), init-session.sh, check-complete.sh --validate, and set-active-plan --list/--archive, but the primary restore entry point ('Use the installed scripts/resolve-plan-dir.sh (or .ps1) with the host's PLAN_ID and PWF_PLAN_ROOT') is described without an example command line, matching the 'mostly executable guidance with minor gaps' anchor.

Workflow Clarity

The lifecycle has explicit validation checkpoints ('Validation must succeed before substantive work and after changing phase structure'), a 3-strike escalation feedback loop, and an approval gate for archiving, but the opening restore section interleaves resolve-plan-dir prose with a session-catchup snippet whose role in the sequence is unclear, leaving minor gaps versus the fully explicit anchor 5.

Progressive Disclosure

References are clearly signaled and one level deep, but scored against the actual bundle, six referenced paths are dead: templates/task_plan.md, templates/findings.md, templates/progress.md, reference.md, examples.md, and plan-inventory.md do not exist in the bundle, so 'Copy these templates to start' and 'See [reference.md](reference.md)' fail at use time — broken navigation for over half the non-script references places this below the 'references present but not clearly signaled' anchor 3.

Specificity

Names several concrete actions ('Keeps task_plan.md, findings.md, and progress.md on disk; lifecycle hooks inject selected project planning context', 'session-catchup.py --metadata reads same-project local agent session records and emits aggregate counts only'), but coverage is skewed toward recovery and hook mechanics rather than the breadth of planning capabilities, matching the 'several specific actions; minor gaps' anchor rather than the comprehensive anchor 5.

Completeness

Both what (persistent file-based planning with named files, hooks, and recovery modes) and when ('Use for research or work needing 5+ tool calls') are explicitly present, but the when-clause is narrow and metric-driven rather than covering the multi-step/build/organize cases the body targets, matching anchor 4 rather than the concrete-trigger-phrases anchor 5.

Trigger Term Quality

'planning', 'multi-step', and 'research' are natural terms, but the only trigger phrase is 'Use for research or work needing 5+ tool calls', which is mechanical rather than something a user would say, and common variations like 'long task', 'track progress', or 'stay organized' are absent — fitting the 'some relevant keywords but missing common variations' anchor.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Named planning files, hook-based context injection, and the recovery/catchup behavior carve a distinct niche with little chance of firing for unrelated skills; only minor overlap remains with generic task-organization skills, fitting the 'mostly distinct; minor overlap risk' anchor.