Conciseness

The body is imperative and lean with zero concept-explanation padding, but schema handling ('--schema') is stated three times (step 2, the note in step 3, and a guardrail bullet). Minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed, matching anchor 4 rather than the every-token-earns-its-place anchor 5.

Actionability

Fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands ('openspec new change "<name>"', 'openspec status --change "<name>"', 'openspec instructions <first-artifact-id> --change "<name>"'), a named interaction tool (AskUserQuestion), and a concrete kebab-case derivation example. Matches anchor 5: specific commands cover the common cases.

Workflow Clarity

A clear numbered 1-6 sequence with an explicit STOP checkpoint (step 6), a status-driven decision point ('find the first artifact with status "ready"'), and error-recovery guardrails (invalid name -> ask for a valid one; existing change -> suggest continuing). No destructive or batch operations, so the feedback-loop cap does not apply; checkpoints and recovery guidance are explicit, matching anchor 5.

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist and none are needed: every section (Input, Steps, Output, Guardrails) is essential workflow instruction that belongs in SKILL.md, with nothing inlined that should be split out and trivially easy navigation. Per the simple-skill guidance this self-contained, well-sectioned structure matches anchor 5; not 4 because there are no organization gaps to point to.

Specificity

Names the concrete domain ('OpenSpec change', 'experimental artifact workflow') and one action ('Start a new change'), but does not enumerate the specific operations it performs (scaffolding the change directory, showing artifact status, fetching first-artifact instructions). Fits anchor 3: domain plus 1-2 concrete actions, not comprehensive.

Completeness

Explicitly answers both: 'Start a new OpenSpec change using the experimental artifact workflow' (what) and 'Use when the user wants to create a new feature, fix, or modification with a structured step-by-step approach' (when, with concrete trigger phrases). Matches anchor 5; the when-clause is already explicit, so anchor 4's 'could be more explicit' does not fit.

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural user phrasings ('create a new feature, fix, or modification'), but misses common synonyms users would say such as 'propose a change', 'spec', 'scaffold', or 'workflow'. Good keyword coverage with a few natural terms missing, matching anchor 4 rather than the comprehensive anchor 5.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

'OpenSpec' is a distinct niche, but the broad when-clause ('create a new feature, fix, or modification') could fire on general feature-implementation requests where OpenSpec is not intended. Mostly distinct with minor overlap risk, matching anchor 4; not 5 due to that overlap, not 3 because the named tool anchors it clearly.