Content
76%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable and well-structured for a config skill, but the update workflow lacks a validation/verification checkpoint for what is effectively direct JSON editing, and some content is duplicated across the CLI and manual-config sections.
Suggestions
Add a validation step to 'How to update' (e.g. re-read the config JSON and parse it, or run a `peon config check`/`peon config show` command) before confirming the change, so the workflow earns a higher workflow_clarity score.
Consolidate the duplicated CLI-vs-manual-JSON guidance (disabled_sounds, directory pack bindings) into a single canonical method with the other offered as a brief 'or edit config.json directly' pointer, reducing redundancy.
Move the lower-frequency knobs (annoyed_threshold, annoyed_window_seconds, silent_window_seconds, session_ttl_days) into a collapsed/secondary 'Tuning' subsection so the primary settings list reads even leaner.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean with bullet settings and copy-paste JSON/CLI blocks, but sections like the disabled_sounds example and directory-pack bindings restate the same operations twice (manual JSON plus CLI) and could be trimmed; it stays above the midpoint. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Every setting lists its type and accepted values, and common tasks ship copy-paste-ready commands (peon notifications off, peon packs bind <pack>) and JSON snippets; the 'How to update' steps name the Read/Edit tools explicitly. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 'How to update' section gives a 3-step sequence (Read → Edit → Confirm) but this is a destructive-ish batch operation on a JSON config with no validation step (e.g. re-read/parse the file, confirm valid JSON, or CLI verify); the destructive-config cap holds it at 3. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and none are referenced, so content is one-level flat; sections (Available settings, Examples, Directory pack bindings) are well-organized and navigable, but CLI-versus-manual-JSON duplication could itself be split, leaving minor organization gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |