Generate a structured implementation plan from a draft document. Validates input, checks relevance, analyzes for issues, and generates a complete plan.md with acceptance criteria.
75%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Fix and improve this skill with Tessl
tessl review fix ./skills/humanize-gen-plan/SKILL.mdTransforms a rough draft document into a well-structured implementation plan with clear goals, acceptance criteria (AC-X format), path boundaries, and feasibility suggestions.
The installer hydrates this skill with an absolute runtime root path:
{{HUMANIZE_RUNTIME_ROOT}}flowchart TD
BEGIN([BEGIN]) --> VALIDATE[Validate input/output paths<br/>Run: {{HUMANIZE_RUNTIME_ROOT}}/scripts/validate-gen-plan-io.sh --input <draft> --output <plan>]
VALIDATE --> CHECK{Validation passed?}
CHECK -->|No| REPORT_ERROR[Report validation error<br/>Stop]
REPORT_ERROR --> END_FAIL([END])
CHECK -->|Yes| READ_DRAFT[Read input draft file]
READ_DRAFT --> CHECK_RELEVANCE{Is draft relevant to<br/>this repository?}
CHECK_RELEVANCE -->|No| REPORT_IRRELEVANT[Report: Draft not related to repo<br/>Stop]
REPORT_IRRELEVANT --> END_FAIL
CHECK_RELEVANCE -->|Yes| ANALYZE[Analyze draft for:<br/>- Clarity<br/>- Consistency<br/>- Completeness<br/>- Functionality]
ANALYZE --> HAS_ISSUES{Issues found?}
HAS_ISSUES -->|Yes| RESOLVE[Engage user to resolve issues<br/>via AskUserQuestion]
RESOLVE --> ANALYZE
HAS_ISSUES -->|No| CHECK_METRICS{Has quantitative<br/>metrics?}
CHECK_METRICS -->|Yes| CONFIRM_METRICS[Confirm metrics with user:<br/>Hard requirement or trend?]
CONFIRM_METRICS --> GEN_PLAN
CHECK_METRICS -->|No| GEN_PLAN[Generate structured plan:<br/>- Goal Description<br/>- Acceptance Criteria with TDD tests<br/>- Path Boundaries<br/>- Feasibility Hints<br/>- Dependencies & Milestones]
GEN_PLAN --> WRITE[Write plan to output file<br/>using Edit tool to preserve draft]
WRITE --> REVIEW[Review complete plan<br/>Check for inconsistencies]
REVIEW --> INCONSISTENT{Inconsistencies?}
INCONSISTENT -->|Yes| FIX[Fix inconsistencies]
FIX --> REVIEW
INCONSISTENT -->|No| CHECK_LANG{Multiple languages?}
CHECK_LANG -->|Yes| UNIFY[Ask user to unify language]
UNIFY --> REPORT_SUCCESS
CHECK_LANG -->|No| REPORT_SUCCESS[Report success:<br/>- Plan path<br/>- AC count<br/>- Language unified?]
REPORT_SUCCESS --> END_SUCCESS([END])Required Arguments:
--input <path/to/draft.md> - The draft document--output <path/to/plan.md> - Where to write the planThe generated plan includes:
# Plan Title
## Goal Description
Clear description of what needs to be accomplished
## Acceptance Criteria
- AC-1: First criterion
- Positive Tests (expected to PASS):
- Test case that should succeed
- Negative Tests (expected to FAIL):
- Test case that should fail
## Path Boundaries
### Upper Bound (Maximum Scope)
Most comprehensive acceptable implementation
### Lower Bound (Minimum Scope)
Minimum viable implementation
### Allowed Choices
- Can use: allowed technologies
- Cannot use: prohibited technologies
## Dependencies and Sequence
### Milestones
1. Milestone 1: Description
- Phase A: ...
- Phase B: ...
## Implementation Notes
- Code should NOT contain plan terminology| Exit Code | Meaning |
|---|---|
| 0 | Success - continue |
| 1 | Input file not found |
| 2 | Input file is empty |
| 3 | Output directory does not exist |
| 4 | Output file already exists |
| 5 | No write permission |
| 6 | Invalid arguments |
| 7 | Plan template file not found |
# Start the flow
/flow:humanize-gen-plan
# The flow will ask for:
# - Input draft file path
# - Output plan file pathOr with the skill only (no auto-execution):
/skill:humanize-gen-planPolyArch/humanize
4eeb392
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.