Refine an annotated implementation plan into a comment-free plan and a QA ledger while preserving the gen-plan schema.
76%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Fix and improve this skill with Tessl
tessl review fix ./skills/humanize-refine-plan/SKILL.mdRefines an annotated plan that contains CMT: / ENDCMT blocks into a comment-free plan plus a QA ledger, while preserving the gen-plan structure and convergence state.
The installer hydrates this skill with an absolute runtime root path:
{{HUMANIZE_RUNTIME_ROOT}}flowchart TD
BEGIN([BEGIN]) --> SETUP[Parse arguments and derive paths<br/>Resolve mode, output path, QA path, alt-language]
SETUP --> LOAD_CFG[Load merged config<br/>Reuse humanize config precedence and defaults]
LOAD_CFG --> VALIDATE[Validate IO<br/>Run: {{HUMANIZE_RUNTIME_ROOT}}/scripts/validate-refine-plan-io.sh --input <annotated-plan> [--output ...] [--qa-dir ...] [--discussion|--direct]]
VALIDATE --> VALID_OK{Validation passed?}
VALID_OK -->|No| REPORT_VALIDATION[Report validation error<br/>Stop]
REPORT_VALIDATION --> END_FAIL([END])
VALID_OK --> EXTRACT[Read input plan and extract valid<br/>CMT:/ENDCMT blocks with a stateful scanner]
EXTRACT --> PARSE_OK{Parse succeeded?}
PARSE_OK -->|No| REPORT_PARSE[Report parse error with<br/>line, column, heading, context<br/>Stop]
REPORT_PARSE --> END_FAIL
PARSE_OK --> CLASSIFY[Classify comments:<br/>question, change_request, research_request]
CLASSIFY --> AMBIG{Ambiguous comments?}
AMBIG -->|Yes, discussion mode| ASK_USER[Ask the minimum user question<br/>needed to continue]
ASK_USER --> PROCESS
AMBIG -->|No| PROCESS[Process comments in order:<br/>answer, refine plan, or do targeted repo research]
PROCESS --> REFINE[Generate refined plan text<br/>Keep required gen-plan sections intact]
REFINE --> PLAN_CHECK{Plan still valid?<br/>No CMT markers, references consistent,<br/>routing tags valid}
PLAN_CHECK -->|No, fixable| FIX[Repair internal inconsistencies]
FIX --> PLAN_CHECK
PLAN_CHECK -->|No, blocking| REPORT_BLOCK[Report blocking inconsistency<br/>Stop]
REPORT_BLOCK --> END_FAIL
PLAN_CHECK -->|Yes| QA[Populate QA document from<br/>{{HUMANIZE_RUNTIME_ROOT}}/prompt-template/plan/refine-plan-qa-template.md]
QA --> ALT_LANG{Generate translated variants?}
ALT_LANG -->|Yes| VARIANTS[Translate refined plan and QA<br/>Keep identifiers unchanged]
ALT_LANG -->|No| ATOMIC
VARIANTS --> ATOMIC[Write refined plan, QA, and variants<br/>atomically via temp files]
ATOMIC --> REPORT_SUCCESS[Report success:<br/>paths, counts, mode, convergence status]
REPORT_SUCCESS --> END_SUCCESS([END])Required Arguments:
--input <path/to/annotated-plan.md> - Input plan that already follows the gen-plan schema and contains at least one CMT: / ENDCMT blockOptional Arguments:
--output <path/to/refined-plan.md> - Output path for the refined plan; defaults to in-place mode (--input)--qa-dir <path/to/qa-dir> - Directory for the generated QA ledger; defaults to .humanize/plan_qa--alt-language <language-or-code> - Optional translated output language for plan and QA variants--discussion - Ask the user to resolve ambiguous classifications or language decisions--direct - Resolve ambiguity with the smallest safe assumption and record it in QAArgument Rules:
--discussion and --direct are mutually exclusive--alt-language, so do not pass that flag to validate-refine-plan-io.sh--output is omitted, refine the plan in place and still write the QA document separatelyThe refinement flow must:
gen-plan schema instead of inventing new top-level sectionsCMT: / ENDCMT blocks from the final plan## Goal Description## Acceptance Criteria## Path Boundaries## Feasibility Hints and Suggestions## Dependencies and Sequence## Task Breakdown## Claude-Codex Deliberation## Pending User Decisions## Implementation Notescoding or analyzeEach extracted raw comment block receives one dominant classification:
questionchange_requestresearch_requestThe flow produces:
CMT-N--alt-language supports these normalized values:
| Language | Code | Variant Suffix |
|---|---|---|
| Chinese | zh | _zh |
| Korean | ko | _ko |
| Japanese | ja | _ja |
| Spanish | es | _es |
| French | fr | _fr |
| German | de | _de |
| Portuguese | pt | _pt |
| Russian | ru | _ru |
| Arabic | ar | _ar |
Rules:
English / en as a no-op| Exit Code | Meaning |
|---|---|
| 0 | Success - continue |
| 1 | Input file not found |
| 2 | Input file is empty |
| 3 | Input file has no CMT: blocks |
| 4 | Input file is missing required gen-plan sections |
| 5 | Output directory does not exist or is not writable |
| 6 | QA directory is not writable |
| 7 | Invalid arguments |
# Start the flow
/flow:humanize-refine-plan
# The flow will ask for:
# - Input annotated plan path
# - Optional output refined plan path
# - Optional QA directory
# - Optional execution mode and alternate languageOr with the skill only (no auto-execution):
/skill:humanize-refine-planPolyArch/humanize
4eeb392
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.