Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable flow specification with an explicit validation-gated workflow and feedback loops; its main gaps are minor verbosity and the lack of a complete runnable end-to-end example.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient reference material (argument spec, exit-code table, alt-language table) with no padding about concepts Claude already knows; only minor trimmable redundancy such as the Usage section keeps it off 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete guidance is present — exact validate command with flags, argument signatures, classification values, and template path — but no full end-to-end runnable example with real values, leaving minor gaps versus the 5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The mermaid flowchart gives a clear sequence with explicit validation checkpoints (VALIDATE, PLAN_CHECK), a feedback loop (FIX -> PLAN_CHECK), and error-reporting branches, matching the 5 anchor for validation with error recovery. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well organized into clear sections with no nested references and all material appropriately inline; with no bundle files present and the file over 50 lines, structure is good but not the ideal one-level-deep split of a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |