Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An actionable, well-sequenced skill body with strong validation checkpoints and a concrete operator handoff. It is lean but a couple of dense sections and the absence of bundle-file references keep conciseness and progressive disclosure just short of the top anchor.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and assumes Claude's competence — it never explains what MCP or OAuth is — but a few dense probe-verdict bullets could be slightly tightened, keeping it just below the top anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable: concrete commands ('DEBUG=1 python manage.py probe_mcp_server ...', 'hogli test ...'), precise catalog field guidance, and a copy-paste operator checklist cover the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 6-step workflow with an embedded probe-verdict decision tree, explicit validation ('test_catalog_entries_are_valid'), verification tiers, and a feedback loop (probe failure → re-research). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections (Read first, Workflow, Operator checklist, What not to do) with clearly signaled one-level-deep references to repo files; no bundle files exist, so structure is internal, leaving minor organization headroom. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |