Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Well-structured, actionable guidance that clarifies an ambiguity and renders both chart types with a concrete JSON example and UI-toggle steps. Minor conciseness trims and a slightly less code-complete slope branch keep actionability and conciseness at 4.
Suggestions
Tighten explanatory phrases ('This is the default trend', 'without the noise of the path between') to lift conciseness toward 5.
Add a minimal executable snippet or field-level example for the slope branch (e.g. the trendsFilter display value) to make both render paths equally copy-paste ready.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean and efficient, focused on PostHog-specific details Claude would not know (TrendsQuery, ActionsLineGraph, compareFilter); a few phrases like 'This is the default trend' and 'without the noise of the path between' could be trimmed without losing clarity. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a complete, executable TrendsQuery JSON for the line case and concrete steps for the slope case (run posthog:query-trends, toggle Line/Bar/Slope); the slope branch is instruction-based rather than copy-paste code, which is inherent to a UI toggle but leaves a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear decision sequence — clarify which chart the user wants, then render — with an explicit clarify-before-build checkpoint and guidance on when to skip the question; no post-render verification step, but the operation is non-destructive so the validation cap does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A self-contained skill with no bundle files; the body is well-organized into clear sections (problem, when to ask, how to render each, limits) with no nested or buried references, appropriate for a single-purpose skill of this size. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |