Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-structured skill body: it disambiguates the two readings of 'change', gives concrete render guidance with an executable example, and documents real edge cases without padding. The only slack is minor verbosity in the limits section and the slope path relying on instruction rather than a second code block.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean body with no concept padding Claude already knows; the comparison, either/or question, render paths, and limits all earn their place, with only minor over-explanation in the 'Important limits' prose, fitting between the 4 and 5 anchors. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides an executable TrendsQuery JSON with real field values for the line path and names the exact tool (posthog:query-trends) and UI toggle (Line / Bar / Slope) for the slope path; the slope path is instruction-only but justified since it is a UI toggle on the same query. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear decision sequence — disambiguate, ask an either/or or skip if the user named one, then render via the correct path — with explicit branching logic; this is a single-purpose non-destructive task so the validation cap does not apply, matching the 5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with well-organized sections (intro, How to render each, Important limits) and no external bundle files needed, satisfying the simple-skills note that a well-organized single-purpose skill can score 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |