Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an efficient, highly actionable walkthrough with a complete executable payload and clean delegation to sibling skills. The only gap is the absence of an explicit validation/error-recovery loop, which matters little for a non-destructive creation flow.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient throughout — it assumes Claude's competence, adds only PostHog-specific knowledge (the "web" toolbar caveat, deprecated `parameters` keys), and avoids explaining basic A/B-test or MCP concepts. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a copy-paste-ready, complete `experiment-create` JSON payload covering the common 50/50 case, plus specific documented keys and conventions for variants and rollout percentages. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 3-step flow is clearly sequenced with delegation checkpoints ("Before asking any rollout question, load configuring-experiment-rollout"), defaults, and a post-creation checklist; not a 5 because there is no explicit error-recovery loop, though the operation is non-destructive. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear sections with detail appropriately offloaded to one-level-deep sibling skills (configuring-experiment-rollout, configuring-experiment-analytics, managing-experiment-lifecycle); no bundle files are needed or missing. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |