Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, executable guide with concrete tool calls, numbered workflows with validation checkpoints, and clean one-level-deep references to real bundle files. It is nearly maximally concise, with only minor explanatory phrasing that could be trimmed.
Suggestions
Trim parenthetical asides like 'the design document format is an internal implementation detail' that restate context Claude can infer.
The 'Payload mechanics' paragraph bundles several rules; consider a short bullet list so each escaping/JSON rule is scannable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean and assumes Claude's competence, but a few sentences could be trimmed (e.g. 'the design document format is an internal implementation detail', 'Plain-text fallback of the same message' is fine but several explanatory bullets edge toward over-explanation). | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance throughout: a copy-paste-ready create payload, concrete Liquid/unsubscribe snippets, click-tracking markers, and exact tool names for every create/edit/patch/list workflow. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Multi-step read-modify-write and workflow-step editing flows are explicitly numbered with clear sequence, and include verification checkpoints (fetch fresh source of truth, render preview via workflows-show-email-template, test-run with use_draft=true before publish). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear overview in SKILL.md with two well-signaled one-level-deep references ([references/design-guidelines.md], [references/unlayer-design-json.md]) that both exist as real files; bulk schema/design detail is appropriately split out and navigable. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |