Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A high-quality, actionable skill body with a well-sequenced decision tree, executable tool calls and SQL, and explicit validation gates around the destructive rewrite step. The main improvement is trimming redundancy between the decision tree and the Important notes summary.
Suggestions
Trim the "Important notes" section: points about cache-first, materialisation costs, and SLA-dependence already appear in the decision tree — keep only the notes that add new information (the three usage signals, the agent-feedback nudge).
Consider moving the Step 3 rejection-pattern bullets (cohort breakdown, JOIN+variables, missing variables, HogQL *) into a short reference table or a references file, leaving the main decision tree leaner.
The Example interaction block is somewhat narrative; condensing it to the key diagnostic outputs and the final recommendation would reduce tokens without losing the teaching value.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and dense with product-specific knowledge Claude would not already have (TTL enum values, materialisation eligibility rules), but the "Important notes" section restates several decision-tree points (cache first, materialisation costs) that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance throughout: named tool calls (endpoint-get, endpoints-materialization-preview, etc.), a copy-paste-ready query_log SQL query, concrete enum values, and a decision tree that prescribes specific actions per branch. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequenced decision tree ("walk these in order — the first one that applies is the cheapest fix") plus a 6-step Workflow, with explicit validation gates for the destructive rewrite flow (run original and rewrite, compare results, only then apply) and confirmation before applying fixes. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clearly headed sections (When to use, Available tools, Decision tree, Workflow, Example, Important notes) with no nested references, but it is a single ~190-line file with no external references; some detail (e.g. the Step 3 rejection-pattern bullets) could optionally be split out. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |