Content
92%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-sequenced diagnostic workflow with concrete tools, parameters, and an explicit destructive-action checkpoint. Its only weakness is progressive disclosure: substantial reference tables sit inline in one long file with no bundle files to offload them.
Suggestions
Move the Available tools table and the latest_error substring→root-cause mapping table into a references/ file (e.g. tools-and-errors.md) and link to them from the main body to keep SKILL.md an overview.
Consider extracting the nine recovery-action branches (A–I) into a references/recovery-actions.md, leaving a compact decision pointer in the body that links out for each case.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense, technical prose assuming Claude's competence with no concept padding; status and error mappings are compressed into tables so every token earns its place rather than being padded prose. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Gives concrete tool names with exact parameter shapes (e.g. external-data-sources-partial-update with {job_inputs: {stripe_secret_key: "..."}}) and a worked example interaction, making the guidance copy-paste ready. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequences a clear top-down process (locate → classify status → interpret latest_error → pick recovery → confirm destructive actions) with an explicit validation checkpoint in Step 5 requiring approval before destructive calls, satisfying the feedback-loop requirement for destructive operations. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is self-contained with clear sections and no broken references, but it is a fairly long single file where large reference tables (the 20-row tool table and the error-substring mapping) are candidates for externalization that remain inline. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |