Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured diagnostic workflow with executable queries, clear decision gates, and appropriately offloaded detail to one-level-deep references. It is tight, actionable, and assumes Claude's competence throughout.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and operational — a tool table, a signal quick-reference, five sequenced steps with complete SQL/JSON, a verdict priority list, and a recommendation table — with no padding explaining concepts Claude already knows; it does not reach the verbosity of the level-2 anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready SQL with exact property names and a concrete JSON tool call, plus a verdict-to-action recommendation table — matching the executable, specific-examples anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The five steps are clearly sequenced with explicit decision gates ('If this returns data... If it returns 404, proceed'), a priority-ordered verdict list, and pattern-based branching; the read-only diagnostic context does not trigger the destructive/batch feedback-loop cap. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview that links to three real, one-level-deep reference files (diagnostic-signals.md, diagnosis-logic.md, examples.md), each clearly signaled with purpose, and the referenced paths resolve to actual files. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |